Enter your email and password to access secured content, members only resources and discount prices.
Did you become a member online? If not, you will need to activate your account to login.
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
Enables quick and easy registration for future events or learning and grants access to expert advice and valuable resources.
Enter your details below and create a login
Send me exclusive tips, early access to new launches, and special offers. I can change my mind at any time.
By clicking Get started now you agree to the terms and conditions and privacy policy.
The modelling examines the cumulative impact of the Federal Budget’s primary housing tax reforms, including changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax concession arrangements, together with the $2 billion Housing Support Program.
The updated modelling incorporates the additional measure agreed by Labor and the Greens during negotiations to secure passage of the broader package through Parliament. This measure prohibits self-managed super funds from using limited recourse borrowing arrangements to purchase ordinary residential investment property.
The analysis by Qaive and Tulipwood Economics now finds that, between 2026–27 and 2029–30, the combined housing measures are estimated to:
The findings represent a further deterioration from the modelling released immediately after the Budget, which already showed that the package would reduce housing construction, weaken economic activity, and place additional pressure on renters.
The updated figures reinforce a straightforward point: Australia cannot resolve its housing shortage through policies that make it harder to finance, build, and supply rental homes.
With the national 1.2 million-home target already under significant pressure, policy settings that are estimated to remove 10,700 new homes from the market move Australia further away from its housing objectives.
Housing policy must place supply first. This means accelerating planning and approvals, delivering enabling infrastructure, supporting construction capacity and skills, and maintaining the investment needed to provide homes for Australia’s growing population.
The housing industry remains concerned about the difference between the Government’s stated expectations and the findings of the independent modelling. The Government has claimed that its housing measures will deliver:
The industry will continue to monitor market data and assess the effects of the reforms against the Government’s stated claims. As evidence becomes available, the industry will report on whether those claims are being borne out and hold the Government to account for the impacts of these changes.
A copy of the supplementary independent modelling can be found here.
From today, every new home built in Tasmania must meet the full Livable Housing Design requirements. The Housing Industry Association says this adds thousands of dollars to the cost of building a home, at a time when Tasmanians can least afford it.
Changes to Western Australia's requirements for managing the risks of falls will commence on 1 October 2026, introducing new expectations for builders, contractors and workers undertaking tasks where there is a risk of falling.
As of today, 1 October 2026, all new building work in Tasmania, unless exempt, must comply with all requirements of Part H8 Livable Housing Design of NCC Volume Two.
“The ACT’s housing supply pipeline is weakening, with building approvals in the three months to August halving compared with a year earlier,” said HIA Executive Director ACT and Southern NSW, Geordan Murray.