Address
{{propApi.title}}
{{propApi.text}} {{region}} Change location{{propApi.title}}
{{propApi.successMessage}} {{region}} Change location Address
{{propApi.title}}
{{propApi.text}} {{region}} Change location{{propApi.title}}
{{propApi.successMessage}} {{region}} Change locationGovernment's 1.2 million housing target becomes harder to reach from today
Government's 1.2 million housing target becomes harder to reach from today
Member and guest login
Enter your email and password to access secured content, members only resources and discount prices.
Did you become a member online? If not, you will need to activate your account to login.
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
Forgotten password
Need some help?
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
If the email address you have entered is registered, you will receive an email with further instructions.
Become part of the HIA community
Enables quick and easy registration for future events or learning and grants access to expert advice and valuable resources.
Create a guest account
Enter your details below and create a login
Send me exclusive tips, early access to new launches, and special offers. I can change my mind at any time.
By clicking Get started now you agree to the terms and conditions and privacy policy.
"From today it gets harder for Australia to build the 1.2 million homes governments have committed too," said HIA Chief Economist, Tim Reardon.
Monday, 10th August 2026
From today, new Limited Recourse Borrowing Arrangements (LRBAs) can no longer be used by Self-Managed Super Funds (SMSFs) to build new residential homes. The Housing Industry Association (HIA) has consistently warned that removing this source of finance from the housing market will reduce investment in new homes at precisely the time Australia needs significantly more housing.
"Initial analysis indicates that the SMSF ban is likely to have a greater adverse impact on the supply of new homes than the Government's changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax combined," said HIA Chief Economist, Tim Reardon.
“Despite this, there hasn’t been a cost/benefit analysis, a regulatory impact statement or even Treasury modelling released to justify the policy change.
“The government hasn’t declared what the net public benefit will be from denying tens of thousands of Australian’s access to a home, each year.
"Our survey of Australia's largest home builders indicates the SMSF changes alone will reduce detached home commencements by between 3.5 and 5 per cent per year.
“In addition, around 2,500 new home contracts that had already been signed are expected to be cancelled as the administrative arrangements could not be completed by today.
“The adverse shock of prohibiting borrowing to build a new apartment by an SMSF is likely to be more significant.
"Governments have committed to delivering 1.2 million new homes. Yet from today, Australia is removing one of the investment pathways that has helped finance the construction of new housing."
"You cannot make it harder to invest in new homes and expect more homes to be built."
"Not a single SMSF lives in a home in Australia and therefore aren’t adding to demand.
“And when an SMSF builds a new home, they do not add to demand, but they only add to supply.
“The housing challenge needs to be considered as if we are trying to squeeze 11 million households into 10 million homes.
“The cause of the housing challenge isn’t that we have too many investors, or that prices are too high. These are the symptoms of a shortage of housing stock, not the cause of the shortage.
“Every new policy should be assessed against a simple test: does it increase the number of homes built?
"The Government should release the modelling that informed this decision, including its estimate of how many fewer homes will be built as a consequence of banning SMSF borrowing for residential property.
"If that modelling has not been undertaken, then the Government should commission and publish a cost benefit analysis of the policy, including its impact on housing commencements, rental supply, construction employment and government revenues for state and federal governments.
"Treasury has estimated the housing supply consequences of the changes to negative gearing. Australians deserve the same transparency for a policy that will have a tangible adverse impact on the supply of new homes commencing construction.
"If we are serious about building 1.2 million homes, every policy should encourage, not discourage, investment in new housing."
"Initial analysis indicates that the SMSF ban is likely to have a greater adverse impact on the supply of new homes than the Government's changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax combined," said HIA Chief Economist, Tim Reardon.
“Despite this, there hasn’t been a cost/benefit analysis, a regulatory impact statement or even Treasury modelling released to justify the policy change.
“The government hasn’t declared what the net public benefit will be from denying tens of thousands of Australian’s access to a home, each year.
"Our survey of Australia's largest home builders indicates the SMSF changes alone will reduce detached home commencements by between 3.5 and 5 per cent per year.
“In addition, around 2,500 new home contracts that had already been signed are expected to be cancelled as the administrative arrangements could not be completed by today.
“The adverse shock of prohibiting borrowing to build a new apartment by an SMSF is likely to be more significant.
"Governments have committed to delivering 1.2 million new homes. Yet from today, Australia is removing one of the investment pathways that has helped finance the construction of new housing."
"You cannot make it harder to invest in new homes and expect more homes to be built."
"Not a single SMSF lives in a home in Australia and therefore aren’t adding to demand.
“And when an SMSF builds a new home, they do not add to demand, but they only add to supply.
“The housing challenge needs to be considered as if we are trying to squeeze 11 million households into 10 million homes.
“The cause of the housing challenge isn’t that we have too many investors, or that prices are too high. These are the symptoms of a shortage of housing stock, not the cause of the shortage.
“Every new policy should be assessed against a simple test: does it increase the number of homes built?
"The Government should release the modelling that informed this decision, including its estimate of how many fewer homes will be built as a consequence of banning SMSF borrowing for residential property.
"If that modelling has not been undertaken, then the Government should commission and publish a cost benefit analysis of the policy, including its impact on housing commencements, rental supply, construction employment and government revenues for state and federal governments.
"Treasury has estimated the housing supply consequences of the changes to negative gearing. Australians deserve the same transparency for a policy that will have a tangible adverse impact on the supply of new homes commencing construction.
"If we are serious about building 1.2 million homes, every policy should encourage, not discourage, investment in new housing."
For more information please contact:
Latest articles
10 Aug
Government's 1.2 million housing target becomes harder to reach from today
"From today it gets harder for Australia to build the 1.2 million homes governments have committed too," said HIA Chief Economist, Tim Reardon.
07 Aug
Clarence tops the state for new homes approved in 2025-26
Clarence approved more new homes than any other council in Tasmania over the past year, figures released yesterday by the Australian Bureau of Statistics show.
06 Aug
Minimum Financial Requirements - What you need to know
The new Minimum Financial Requirements (MFR) for Victorian home builders started on Wednesday, 1 July 2026.
06 Aug
Housing target depends on faster land supply
“The median price of residential land eased by just 0.4 per cent in the March quarter to $403,570, but remains 8.7 per cent higher than a year earlier, growing more than twice as fast as consumer prices and almost three times faster than wages,” stated HIA Senior Economist Tom Devitt.