Enter your email and password to access secured content, members only resources and discount prices.
Did you become a member online? If not, you will need to activate your account to login.
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
Enables quick and easy registration for future events or learning and grants access to expert advice and valuable resources.
Enter your details below and create a login
Send me exclusive tips, early access to new launches, and special offers. I can change my mind at any time.
By clicking Get started now you agree to the terms and conditions and privacy policy.
The Housing Industry Association (HIA) has called on the Australian Government to release Treasury's assessment of the impact that new restrictions on self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) borrowing will have on the supply of new homes.
“The Government had already acknowledged through the Budget that changes to housing taxation would reduce the supply of new homes.
"HIA's concern is straightforward. Restricting access to capital available to finance new housing is likely to reduce the number of homes that are built. The question is by how much?
“SMSFs represent one source of private investment that supported the construction of new housing, particularly in markets where investor demand contributed to project feasibility.
"Policies that reduce investment in new housing should be accompanied by transparent advice on their likely impact on housing supply.
"Housing does not become more affordable if fewer homes are built.
“Calculating the number of loans for the purchase and construction of a new home by SMSFs does not account for the loss of new home supply caused by the policy change.
“Home building is determined by the marginal borrower, especially in the case of apartment building, so removing a small number of projects can have a larger adverse impact on housing supply.
"Every new home also generates tax revenue through GST and stamp duty and additional restriction at the Federal level can adversely impact state revenue.
“The Government has also introduced a range of positive housing initiatives through the Budget, including increased investment in enabling infrastructure and planning reform.
"Those policies recognise that Australia needs more homes.
"The question now is whether restricting another source of private investment will offset some of those gains.
"We know the Government considered the housing impacts of the negative gearing reforms. The same level of transparency should apply to the SMSF borrowing restrictions,” concluded Mr Reardon.
This member alert is for members who enter into domestic building contracts entered into before 1 July 2026. It is also important information for members who enter into domestic building contracts with clients with untitled land.
Over the past few weeks HIA has been advocating strongly on behalf of members on a range of policy and regulatory issues that have significant implications for housing supply, business confidence and the capacity of our industry to deliver the homes Australia needs.
The Housing Industry Association (HIA) has today written to the Tasmanian Government calling for a commitment that state-funded and state-partnered housing work will continue to be awarded on merit, not industrial arrangements, warning new federal procurement rules could shrink the pool of builders able to deliver the homes Tasmania needs.
The Victorian Government continues to push ahead with its Working from Home laws despite the Housing Industry Association’s (HIA) call for it to abandon its proposed legislation, warning the changes would impose additional regulatory pressure on businesses already struggling and kill productivity.