Enter your email and password to access secured content, members only resources and discount prices.
Did you become a member online? If not, you will need to activate your account to login.
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
Enables quick and easy registration for future events or learning and grants access to expert advice and valuable resources.
Enter your details below and create a login
Send me exclusive tips, early access to new launches, and special offers. I can change my mind at any time.
By clicking Get started now you agree to the terms and conditions and privacy policy.
HIA Managing Director Jocelyn Martin said HIA continues to strongly oppose the proposed housing taxation changes, which risk discouraging investment and reduce housing supply at a time of acute housing shortage.
“Treasury’s own modelling shows these changes could reduce housing supply by around 35,000 homes over the next decade.
“That is the wrong outcome at the wrong time, when Australia is already struggling to meet its housing targets.
“While HIA does not support the taxation changes, our focus is now on making a flawed proposal more workable and minimising the damage to housing supply.”
Ms Martin said the Association is engaging constructively through the Senate Inquiry to improve the legislation.
“A key concern that HIA will make in its submission to the Senate Inquiry is the draft legislation adopts a too narrow definition of ‘new housing,’ which does not reflect how new supply is actually delivered.
“To support supply, the legislation must capture the full range of housing being delivered in today’s market."
HIA is calling on the Senate to broaden the definition of new housing to explicitly include:
“If an ageing or unliveable home is replaced or substantially upgraded, that is a genuine addition to Australia’s effective housing supply.
“Modern homes are designed to accommodate more people, support changing household structures and make better use of existing land and infrastructure.”
HIA warned that excluding these forms of development risks creating perverse outcomes, where some housing types qualify while others delivering similar or greater housing capacity do not.
“In many established suburbs, planning rules limit higher-density development. Knock down rebuilds and secondary dwellings are often the only practical way to increase supply.
“If these are not recognised, the policy will work against its own objective.”
Ms Martin said the broader tax changes, including to capital gains tax, also risk dampening investor confidence and reducing the viability of new housing projects.
"Australia needs more investment in housing, not less.
“The Senate Inquiry is a critical opportunity to correct these flaws. Without meaningful amendments, these changes will reduce supply, increase pressure on affordability and undermine the stated goal of boosting new housing,” concluded Ms Martin.
This member alert is for members who enter into domestic building contracts entered into before 1 July 2026. It is also important information for members who enter into domestic building contracts with clients with untitled land.
Over the past few weeks HIA has been advocating strongly on behalf of members on a range of policy and regulatory issues that have significant implications for housing supply, business confidence and the capacity of our industry to deliver the homes Australia needs.
The Housing Industry Association (HIA) has today written to the Tasmanian Government calling for a commitment that state-funded and state-partnered housing work will continue to be awarded on merit, not industrial arrangements, warning new federal procurement rules could shrink the pool of builders able to deliver the homes Tasmania needs.
The Victorian Government continues to push ahead with its Working from Home laws despite the Housing Industry Association’s (HIA) call for it to abandon its proposed legislation, warning the changes would impose additional regulatory pressure on businesses already struggling and kill productivity.