Enter your email and password to access secured content, members only resources and discount prices.
Did you become a member online? If not, you will need to activate your account to login.
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
Enables quick and easy registration for future events or learning and grants access to expert advice and valuable resources.
Enter your details below and create a login
Send me exclusive tips, early access to new launches, and special offers. I can change my mind at any time.
By clicking Get started now you agree to the terms and conditions and privacy policy.
HIA’s analysis finds that outdated minimum lot size rules embedded in planning schemes across Australia are preventing new homes from being delivered in established suburbs, making it near impossible to meet the National Housing Accord target of 1.2 million new homes.
“Governments are setting housing targets with one hand and shutting down supply with the other,” said HIA Executive Director Planning & Development, Sam Heckel.
“You cannot meet housing targets while leaving 1950s planning rules untouched,” said Mr Heckel.
HIA data shows housing construction remains well below the 240,000 homes a year required to meet national targets, while land prices have surged to record highs. Despite this, up to 80 per cent of residential land in many cities remains locked into low-density zoning or similar with minimum lot sizes that effectively prohibit subdivision.
“These rules are a political choice, not a technical necessity,” he said.
“They were designed for a completely different time, yet governments continue to protect them even as affordability collapses.
“Minimum lot sizes are one of the easiest supply constraints for governments to remove yet remain largely untouched because of political reluctance to reform suburban planning controls.
“Governments keep talking about affordability, but this is where it is being lost.
“Smaller, sensible lot sizes in well-located suburbs would deliver more homes quickly, without high-rise development and without major infrastructure spending.
“Concerns about overdevelopment are being used as an excuse for inaction, despite the fact subdivision is already limited by stormwater rules, flooding, demolition costs, heritage protections and market demand.
“The market already decides where subdivision works and where it doesn’t. What governments are doing is stopping it everywhere, regardless of context,” said Mr Heckel.
“HIA modelling shows reducing minimum lot sizes from 500sqm to 300sqm would cut the land cost of a new home by more than $200,000 providing immediate relief for first home buyers and downsizers.
“This is a fast, low-cost reform that governments could implement tomorrow.
“If governments are genuinely serious about housing supply and affordability, minimum lot sizes must go. Continuing to defend them means accepting higher prices, lower supply and ongoing failure to meet housing targets,” concluded Mr Heckel.
HIA has released the latest version of its Housing Scorecard. Once again Victoria is underperforming and has now fallen below New South Wales. Only Tasmania, the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory keep Victoria from claiming the wooden spoon.
Tasmania has ranked last in the national HIA Housing Scorecard released today, underscoring a persistent failure to deliver enough new homes to meet current and future housing demand.
“Western Australia retained its status as Australia’s strongest home building market, even extending its lead, atop HIA’s latest Housing Scorecard,” stated HIA Senior Economist Tom Devitt.
“The Housing Industry Association (HIA) welcomes today’s commitment by the Federal Government of more than $45 million over the next 4 years to fast track implementation of the key reforms to the EPBC Act,” said HIA Managing Director, Jocelyn Martin.