Enter your email and password to access secured content, members only resources and discount prices.
Did you become a member online? If not, you will need to activate your account to login.
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
Enables quick and easy registration for future events or learning and grants access to expert advice and valuable resources.
Enter your details below and create a login
Send me exclusive tips, early access to new launches, and special offers. I can change my mind at any time.
By clicking Get started now you agree to the terms and conditions and privacy policy.
"New Australian research has reinforced concerns that minimum lot size requirements, many of which were introduced to address planning challenges from a very different era, continue to hold back housing supply today," said HIA Executive Director Planning & Development, Sam Heckel.
The research paper, What Local Land Use Reform Does, and Doesn't Do, by the e61 Institute and the Centre for International Economics examined planning reforms in Adelaide's City of Campbelltown and found that reducing minimum lot size requirements increased housing approvals by 67 per cent, with the additional supply largely delivered through townhouses and row housing.
"At a time when governments are struggling to meet ambitious housing targets, many planning schemes continue to impose minimum lot size requirements that limit housing supply and housing choice.
"The impact is not just fewer homes. Restrictive lot size controls often prevent the delivery of smaller and more affordable housing options that can provide an entry point into established suburbs for first home buyers, downsizers and key workers."
The findings support HIA's recent Increasing Gentle Density: Unlocking Subdivision report, which identified minimum lot size controls as a major barrier to increasing housing supply and a conservative reduction of minimum lot sizes could reduce the cost of a new home by more than $200,000 through lower land costs alone.
"Large parts of Australian cities remain subject to lot size requirements that no longer reflect modern housing needs.
"Importantly, this new independent research also demonstrates that when planning barriers are removed, industry responds. The issue is often not a lack of industry capacity, but the planning controls that limit what can be built.
“Australia is already projected to fall well short of the National Housing Accord target of 1.2 million homes.
"If governments are serious about improving affordability and increasing supply, they must be prepared to reform outdated planning controls that prevent land from being used more efficiently.
"There is no shortage of reports, reviews and policy proposals recommending greater housing diversity and more efficient use of residential land.
"What is often missing is the urgency required to translate those recommendations into tangible housing outcomes for Australians struggling to find a home." concluded Mr Heckel.
Imposing registration and licensing on trades represents a significant impost, further degrading the capacity to deliver homes and other domestic building work. This submission, therefore, is not limited to responding to the Consultation Paper, rather, it addresses more broadly the significant risks that imposing registration and licensing on trades will have on the sector.
The Federal Government has announced that the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) will continue to accept credit card payments for tax liabilities until the end of the 2026-27 financial year, delaying changes that were previously due to take effect on 1 December.
The Housing Industry Association (HIA) welcomes the Federal Government's stepping in and agreeing to delay the Australian Taxation Office's (ATO) proposed ban on credit card payments, providing builders, tradies and suppliers with much-needed breathing space while a longer-term solution is developed.
The Housing Industry Association (HIA) says the Victorian results in the HIA National Housing Accord Update released yesterday, while not as poor as some other states, highlight the urgent need for a reset in housing policy after the upcoming state election.