Enter your email and password to access secured content, members only resources and discount prices.
Did you become a member online? If not, you will need to activate your account to login.
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
Enables quick and easy registration for future events or learning and grants access to expert advice and valuable resources.
Enter your details below and create a login
Send me exclusive tips, early access to new launches, and special offers. I can change my mind at any time.
By clicking Get started now you agree to the terms and conditions and privacy policy.
Across both responses, HIA delivered one message: Australia’s workplace laws are severely undermining the industry expected to fix the nation’s housing crisis.
“Homes that should be built are not. Builders are leaving the industry and small business owners who should be hiring aren’t,” said HIA Senior Executive Director of Compliance and Workplace Relations, Stuart Collins.
“If Australia’s 1.2 million homes target is not met, it will be in part due to the country’s workplace laws.
“The residential building sector’s productivity issues are the direct result of a workplace relations system that drives up compliance costs, removes flexibility, and fuels dispute risk - all of which discourage the employment decisions needed to build more homes.
“The surge in Fair Work Commission matters - which President Justice Adam Hatcher has described as ‘unsustainable’ - is further proof of a system creating, rather than resolving disputes,” Mr Collins said.
HIA’s submission to the first comprehensive review of the NES and presents a clear conclusion: the framework has failed.
“Everything HIA warned of when the Fair Work Act commenced has now occurred. More complexity, lower productivity, higher dispute risk, and small builders unable to grow despite record demand for housing,” Mr Collins said.
“Residential building is made up of 97% small businesses, 80% independent contracting, and undertakes project based, weather dependent operations. Yet we remain bound to standards designed for a generic office or factory workforce. It simply does not fit."
Mr Collins also highlighted the extreme compliance burden under the Building and Construction General On-site Award 2020.
“Calculating pay can involve up to 12 variables per day. Under the new criminal wage theft laws, an inadvertent error can be a criminal offence. No comparable system criminalises complexity mistakes.
HIA’s submission to the Closing Loopholes Review warns that the reforms have failed to meet their objectives and instead created new risks.
“These changes overturn the High Court’s 2022 clarity on contractor status and expose genuine subcontracting to misclassification as labour hire avoidance. That threatens the operational model that delivers two thirds of Australia’s homes,” Mr Collins said.
“The reforms also expand union access and enforcement powers without corresponding accountability, at a time when the industry is trying to deal with the documented unlawful conduct by the CFMEU.
“Yet civil penalties for builders have increased to $939,000 per breach, with no scaling for business size."
HIA has called for practical, targeted reforms, including:
“The most effective corrective action - short of the repeal of the recent reforms - is the establishment of separate legislative treatment and explicit statutory carve-outs for the residential building sector,” concluded Mr Collins.
The Housing Industry Association (HIA) has welcomed the ACT Government’s decision to progress the Missing Middle Housing reforms. This is a critical step toward increasing housing supply and improving housing choice across Canberra.
The Federal Budget 2026 introduces the most significant structural changes to housing taxation in decades. As the implications of the Budget became a little clearer this week, HIA’s Chief Economist, Tim Reardon and I have put together this summary
HIA responded to the Consultation Paper on the Review of Australia’s Mutual Recognition Schemes for Workers which details the Council’s interim findings on barriers to a single national market for workers supported by the mutual recognition framework and triggers the second round of consultation associated with the review.
HIA provided this further submission to inform the Expert Panel’s first review of the Road Transport Contracting Chain Order made on 28 April 2026.