{{ propApi.closeIcon }}
Our industry
Our industry $vuetify.icons.faArrowRight
Housing industry insights Economics Insights Data & forecasts Tailored research & analysis Advocacy & policy Advocacy Policy priorities Position statements Submissions News & inspiration Industry news Member alerts Media releases HOUSING Online
Business support
Business support $vuetify.icons.faArrowRight
For your business Contracts Online Safety systems & solutions Advertise jobs HIA SafeScan Member perks Toyota vehicles The Good Guys Commercial Ampol fuel savings See all Industry insurance HIA Insurance Services Construction works insurance Home warranty insurance Tradies & tool insurance Apprentices Why host a HIA apprentice? Hire an apprentice Support & guidance Contracts & compliance support Building & planning services
Resources & advice
Resources & advice $vuetify.icons.faArrowRight
Building it right Building codes Australian standards Getting it right on site See all Building materials & products Concrete, bricks & walls Getting products approved Use the right products for the job See all Managing your business Dealing with contracts Handling disputes Managing your employees See all Managing your safety Safety rules Working with silica See all Building your business Growing your business Maintaining your business See all Other subjects Getting approval to build Sustainable homes See all
Careers & learning
Careers & learning $vuetify.icons.faArrowRight
A rewarding career Become an apprentice Apprenticeships on offer How do I apply? Frequently asked questions Study with us Find a course to suit you Qualification courses Learning on demand Professional development courses A job in the industry Get your builder's licence Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Further your career Find jobs
HIA community
HIA community $vuetify.icons.faArrowRight
Join HIA Sign me up How do I become a member? What's in it for me? Mates rates Our podcasts Made To Build Built Different HIA Building Australia Building the Hunter Our initiatives HIA Building Women GreenSmart Kitchen, bathroom & design hub Get involved Become an award judge Join a committee Partner with us Support for you Charitable Foundation Mental health program Get to know us Our members Our people
Awards & events
Awards & events $vuetify.icons.faArrowRight
Awards Awards program People & Business Awards GreenSmart Australian Housing Awards Awards winners Regional Award winners Australian Housing Award winners 2025 Australian Home of the Year Enter online Industry events Events in the next month Economic outlook National Conference Events calendar
HIA shop
HIA shop $vuetify.icons.faArrowRight
Most popular products National Construction Code Vol 1 & 2 Waterproofing wet areas AS 3740:2021 HIA Guide to Waterproofing HIA Guide to NCC Livable Housing Provisions Top categories Building codes & standards Contracts & documents Guides & manuals Safety products Signage For your business Contracts Online Digital Australian Standards Digital Resource Library Forecasts & data
About Contact Newsroom
$vuetify.icons.faTimes
$vuetify.icons.faMapMarker Set my location Use the field below to update your location
Address
Change location
{{propApi.title}}
{{propApi.text}} {{region}} Change location
{{propApi.title}}
{{propApi.successMessage}} {{region}} Change location

$vuetify.icons.faPhone1300 650 620

Avoiding the vicious affordability cycle

Avoiding the vicious affordability cycle

{{ tag.label }} {{ tag.label }} $vuetify.icons.faTimes
Governments say they want more affordable housing but their funding models often do the opposite. With a proposed new policy, are we breaking new ground – or dangerously close to repeating old mistakes?

Tim Reardon

HIA Chief Economist


In 2024, HIA released a paper titled Who Pays to Make Water Flow Uphill, laying out a paradox in Australia’s housing system – while governments proclaim the need for more affordable housing, they persist in funding infrastructure through narrow levies on new housing development. This approach has placed the cost of public goods squarely on the shoulders of a small cohort of households, those building a new home. This burden has resulted in fewer new homes being built, leading to an increasingly unaffordable market.

During the 2025 federal election, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced a commitment to invest $10 billion to deliver up to 100,000 homes ;reserved only for first home buyers’, with funding to be directed toward enabling infrastructure, land purchases, or construction. This initiative risks replicating the same policy missteps outlined in the original ‘water uphill’ argument.

What’s improved

The federal government’s support for states to build enabling infrastructure is a positive and overdue development. The cost of providing infrastructure and, more importantly, who pays for it, is critical to the price of land. The cost of building water, sewerage, roads and utilities is the most expensive and time-consuming component of bringing land to market. The additional taxes imposed through this process are central to why up to 50 per cent of a new house and land package is comprised of taxes, fees and charges.

Historically, this infrastructure was funded from consolidated revenue and other broad-based tax measures. But from the 1990s onward, this balance shifted. Today, state and local governments have effectively transferred the full cost of public infrastructure to developers, who in turn pass it on to buyers. These costs are layered with cascading charges, raising the final price of land far beyond its undeveloped value.

By stepping back into this space, the government is helping to unpick a decades-old knot. The ‘user pays’ model of infrastructure development is at the core of the housing undersupply, and returning to funding infrastructure from consolidated revenue spreads the cost of public goods across the community. This process not only generates economic activity and increases revenue, but it also addresses the inequity caused by the housing stock shortage, enhancing development feasibility and bringing more homes to market sooner.

If there were ever an instance of government investment ‘paying for itself’, it’s infrastructure that directly enables housing development amid a housing crisis.

Infrastructure directly enables housing development amid a housing crisis.

What remains the same

However, the positive impact of this funding risks being diminished by the restrictive eligibility condition that homes built with this funding can only be sold to first-home buyers. It isn’t unreasonable if the government is going to provide funding to the states. They are seeking something in return. However, establishing conditionality for first-home buyers could be counterproductive.

This stipulation that a share of land sales must flow to first-home buyers is functionally equivalent to inclusionary zoning. While the government is opening one door with infrastructure investment, it is closing another by constraining who can purchase the resulting homes, narrowing the pool of eligible buyers and distorting market dynamics.

The problem is not the support for first-home buyers itself. HIA supports measures that help Australians achieve homeownership. But limiting sales to one cohort undermines the economic feasibility of the developments being subsidised, which could ultimately lead to reduced sales and delay the delivery of new land to the market.

Governments have transferred the full cost of public infrastructure to developers, who in turn pass it on to buyers.

This contradiction is precisely the trap outlined in “Who Pays to Make Water Flow Uphill”: policies that appear to support housing on one level but create hidden disincentives that ultimately reduce housing output. In this case, the government is both the enabler and restrictor—subsidising infrastructure while limiting its benefit to a single buyer group.

The Albanese Government experienced this same contradiction when it introduced a tax concession for Australian superannuation companies to invest in ‘Build to Rent’ projects. This initiative could have increased investment in housing. After amendments from minor parties, additional costs were added to future ‘Build to Rent’ projects, which will undermine the success of this initiative. These additional charges, although intended to support affordable/essential housing, again rely on a narrow group of households to pay for the cost of subsidised housing.

The public should pay for the cost of public housing, not just a select group of households.

Inclusionary zoning

The broader concern is the growing reliance on conditional housing policies, including inclusionary zoning and similar mandates, as tools for improving perceived affordability. These policies compel developers to reserve a proportion of dwellings for specific income groups or tenure types, often at below-market prices.

HIA has long opposed such policies, not because of their goals but because of their unintended consequences:

  • They shift the cost of public housing onto a narrow cohort of households that are renting or seeking to build a new home. 
  • They reduce project viability, leading to less overall housing supply and exacerbating the inequity of the housing shortage.
  • They create a two-tiered housing market with higher costs for non-targeted buyers.

Inclusionary zoning does not address the housing shortage; it redistributes it. It treats symptoms, not causes, and in doing so, creates new problems. As Who Pays to Make Water Flow Uphill warned: As governments make land more expensive, they are effectively reducing the supply of new homes and working against the problem they are seeking to solve.

Affordable and public housing are public goods; their costs should also be shared by all.

Public housing policy

The deeper philosophical issue is one of equity. Affordable and public housing are public goods. All share the benefits of reduced homelessness and increased social and economic inclusion. As such, their costs should also be shared by all.

Placing the cost of affordable housing only on those buildings or purchasing new homes is inequitable. These buyers already face some of the steepest entry barriers in the market. Forcing them to cross-subsidise housing for others deepens those barriers and pushes even more people out of the market.

If there is a public benefit from social, subsidised or affordable housing, it should be funded through broad-based, equitable mechanisms. These methods align cost with benefit, spread the financial load, and support housing delivery without distorting market function.

 

Recommendations

To ensure housing policies achieve their intended goals, the following principles should guide implementation:
  1. Unlink enabling infrastructure investment from tenure restrictions. Let the market provide the most in-demand housing to support both affordability and feasibility.
  2. Avoid policies that mimic inclusionary zoning, which impose the cost of public housing on a narrow segment of the population.
  3. Fund public and subsidised housing through broad-based taxation, not through conditional development incentives or market mandates.
  4. Encourage states to adopt a transparent, shared-cost infrastructure model, as seen in South Australia.
  5. Establish a national land supply reporting framework to better track development stages and bottlenecks across jurisdictions, enabling informed targeted infrastructure investment.

 

Avoiding repeating past mistakes

The government’s decision to fund enabling infrastructure is a step in the right direction. It acknowledges the core insight from Who Pays to Make Water Flow Uphill: that the rising cost imposed by governments in delivering land is one of the primary barriers to new housing supply. But tying that infrastructure funding to restrictive buyer conditions threatens to repeat old mistakes in a new form.

To truly increase housing supply and affordability, governments must resist the allure of conditionality. Homes will not be built faster or more affordably if markets are narrowed, if buyers are restricted, and if developers are asked to deliver public goods without public support.

Instead, we need a planning and funding system that is transparent, efficient, and fair. Where the cost of making water flow uphill is shared by all, and the benefits of home ownership are accessible to everyone.

For more housing industry insights, visit the HIA Economics updates.

First published on 9 July 2025

You might also like:

View all $vuetify.icons.faArrowRight
Affordable Development Approval (DA) Federal government In Focus
Avoiding the vicious affordability cycle
Governments say they want more affordable housing but their funding models often do the opposite. With a proposed new policy, are we breaking new ground – or dangerously close to repeating old mistakes?
Jul 25
5 min
Read full article $vuetify.icons.faArrowRight
Livable Housing Affordable Low rise construction In Focus
Age of reason
A house that served a family well for 40 years might no longer be fit for purpose. Repurposing that site for more homes or different types of housing isn’t a loss – it’s an opportunity to meet new needs and revitalise neighbourhoo...
Jun 25
2 mins
Read full article $vuetify.icons.faArrowRight
Election Livable Housing Building approvals In Focus
Housing priorities
Housing took centre stage as a key issue in the 2025 federal election. The outcome brings optimism for the future of the Australian housing industry.
Jun 25
4 min
Read full article $vuetify.icons.faArrowRight
Building approvals Building developments In Focus Medium rise construction
Unlocking the missing middle
When it comes to solving our housing crisis, gentle density is an approach that would help create vibrant, sustainable and future-proofed communities.
May 25
4 min
Read full article $vuetify.icons.faArrowRight
Host an apprentice Time management Mental health In Focus
The master of apprentices
The recently retired general manager of HIA Group Training has spent a quarter of a century leading the teams that have helped produce thousands of trades, builders and businesspeople in the Australian housing industry.
May 25
3 mins
Read full article $vuetify.icons.faArrowRight
National Construction Code (NCC) Silica Work Health and Safety (WHS) In Focus
HIA's industry leaders come together on major housing issues
Increase in red tape, the ongoing complexity of NCC 2022 changes, silica issues and WHS reforms were just some of the key topics at HIA’s recent National Services Committees meeting.
May 25
3 min
Read full article $vuetify.icons.faArrowRight
Fees Regulations In Focus Tax
First 15 years of a mortgage are taxes
Australia has an acute housing shortage due to government taxes, costs and delays. So it’s time for policymakers to be ambitious and introduce significant reforms.
May 25
2 min
Read full article $vuetify.icons.faArrowRight
Election Construction Federal government In Focus
Beyond first home buyer grants: The ‘hard-smart’ policy Australia needs
Housing affordability was a defining issue in the 2025 federal election. Now that the Labor Party has won, what does it mean for HIA members and homebuyers in Australia?
May 25
4 min
Read full article $vuetify.icons.faArrowRight
Election Federal government National Construction Code (NCC) In Focus
Members setting out their housing priorities
When an abundance of HIA members met various senators, local members and candidates, they had the chance to tackle significant issues in our industry.
May 25
3 mins
Read full article $vuetify.icons.faArrowRight
Affordable Election In Focus Regulations
Why housing needs to remain a four-year priority
The Labor Government cruised to victory at the recent WA state election, so how will the party deliver on its election promises when it comes to housing affordability?
Apr 25
3 min
Read full article $vuetify.icons.faArrowRight
Budget Election Apprentice In Focus
Federal budget: What’s on offer?
It was the budget that wasn’t meant to happen with the impending federal election, and unfortunately it proved to be a case of missed opportunity to substantially boost housing supply and shifting the dial to over drive.
Apr 25
3 mins
Read full article $vuetify.icons.faArrowRight
Affordable Apprentice Planning In Focus
Tackling the housing crisis
Getting shelter over people’s heads and reversing declining rates of home ownership is the main priority for all governments. So, how can they implement this?
Jan 25
4 min
Read full article $vuetify.icons.faArrowRight