{{propApi.title}}
{{propApi.text}} {{region}} Change location{{propApi.title}}
{{propApi.successMessage}} {{region}} Change location {{propApi.title}}
{{propApi.text}} {{region}} Change location{{propApi.title}}
{{propApi.successMessage}} {{region}} Change locationGlobal negative gearing comparison
Global negative gearing comparison
Member and guest login
Enter your email and password to access secured content, members only resources and discount prices.
Did you become a member online? If not, you will need to activate your account to login.
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
Forgotten password
Need some help?
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
If the email address you have entered is registered, you will receive an email with further instructions.
Become part of the HIA community
Enables quick and easy registration for future events or learning and grants access to expert advice and valuable resources.
Create a guest account
Enter your details below and create a login
An asset is negatively geared when interest payments on borrowings used to finance the asset exceed the income it generates. "Negative gearing" means that these losses can then be used to offset other forms of income such as wages. Although it is most commonly used in the property market, negative gearing can apply to any form of asset.
Australia is not the only country to allow negative gearing. Germany, Japan, Canada and Norway all have very similar systems to ours, with rental losses able to offset total income tax payable and unused losses able to be carried forward to offset future tax liabilities.
Other countries have similar systems, albeit slightly less generous, where rental losses can generally be used to offset future rental income but not other forms of income (e.g. wages income). Some countries do not allow negative gearing but nevertheless have some allowance for rental expenses to reduce overall tax liability.
Negative gearing needs to be considered in the context of the broader tax system, especially personal income tax and capital gains tax.
It is not accurate to focus on only one aspect of our tax system without considering the whole system. For example, relative to other OECD economies, Australia has a high marginal tax rate which kicks in at a low-income threshold. When considering the tax system in aggregate, Australia is one of the most heavily taxed countries in the OECD.
In summary:
Negative gearing (where rental losses can be used to reduce tax on other forms of income) is not unique to Australia. Germany, Japan, Canada and Norway all have very similar systems to ours.
A number of other countries have limited versions of negative gearing, generally with restrictions on deductibility of rental income and limitations on the extent to which losses can offset future income.
Negative gearing has to be viewed in the context of the broader tax system, especially personal income tax and capital gains tax.
Demand for housing continues to outpace supply
“The ongoing influx of overseas migrants has pushed Australia’s population beyond 27.5 million in the first quarter of the year,” stated HIA Chief Economist, Tim Reardon.
HIA welcomes Planning System reform
“The Housing Industry Association welcomes the Premier’s announcement today of the NSW Planning System Reforms Bill 2025,” said Brad Armitage, Executive Director NSW.
Victoria’s Housing Statement – planning reforms not enough
“The Victorian government’s Housing Statement is almost two years old and while a number of significant planning reforms have been introduced the housing target of 800,000 will not be met as homes need to be built and not just planned,” stated HIA Executive Director Victoria, Keith Ryan.
It’s time to move from planning to doing
The Housing Industry Association (HIA) has tabled its submission calling on the Federal Government to act swiftly on the Productivity Commission’s Five Pillars reforms to lift productivity and unlock new housing supply.
Negative gearing global comparison
| Country | Deductible expenses | Loss deductibility | Restrictions | Negative gearing coverage |
| Germany | Yes - everything | Other income |
|
Full negative gearing |
| Australia | Yes - everything | Other income |
|
Full negative gearing |
| Japan | Yes - everything | Other income |
|
Full negative gearing |
| Canada | Yes - everything | Other income |
|
Full negative gearing |
| Norway | Yes - everything except capital improvement | Other income |
|
Full negative gearing |
| France | Yes | Other income |
|
Partial negative gearing |
| United States | Yes | Other property |
|
Partial negative gearing |
| Ireland | Yes | Other property |
|
Partial negative gearing |
| Finland | Yes | Other capital gains |
|
Partial negative gearing |
| Spain | Yes | No |
|
No negative gearing but some deductibility of rental expenses |
| Sweden | No | No |
|
No negative gearing but some deductibility of rental expenses |
Further information:
For a more comprehensive look at international comparisons and property tax, please refer to these reports: