{{propApi.title}}
{{propApi.text}} {{region}} Change location{{propApi.title}}
{{propApi.successMessage}} {{region}} Change location {{propApi.title}}
{{propApi.text}} {{region}} Change location{{propApi.title}}
{{propApi.successMessage}} {{region}} Change locationGlobal negative gearing comparison
Global negative gearing comparison
Member and guest login
Enter your email and password to access secured content, members only resources and discount prices.
Did you become a member online? If not, you will need to activate your account to login.
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
Forgotten password
Need some help?
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
If the email address you have entered is registered, you will receive an email with further instructions.
Become part of the HIA community
Enables quick and easy registration for future events or learning and grants access to expert advice and valuable resources.
Create a guest account
Enter your details below and create a login
An asset is negatively geared when interest payments on borrowings used to finance the asset exceed the income it generates. "Negative gearing" means that these losses can then be used to offset other forms of income such as wages. Although it is most commonly used in the property market, negative gearing can apply to any form of asset.
Australia is not the only country to allow negative gearing. Germany, Japan, Canada and Norway all have very similar systems to ours, with rental losses able to offset total income tax payable and unused losses able to be carried forward to offset future tax liabilities.
Other countries have similar systems, albeit slightly less generous, where rental losses can generally be used to offset future rental income but not other forms of income (e.g. wages income). Some countries do not allow negative gearing but nevertheless have some allowance for rental expenses to reduce overall tax liability.
Negative gearing needs to be considered in the context of the broader tax system, especially personal income tax and capital gains tax.
It is not accurate to focus on only one aspect of our tax system without considering the whole system. For example, relative to other OECD economies, Australia has a high marginal tax rate which kicks in at a low-income threshold. When considering the tax system in aggregate, Australia is one of the most heavily taxed countries in the OECD.
In summary:
Negative gearing (where rental losses can be used to reduce tax on other forms of income) is not unique to Australia. Germany, Japan, Canada and Norway all have very similar systems to ours.
A number of other countries have limited versions of negative gearing, generally with restrictions on deductibility of rental income and limitations on the extent to which losses can offset future income.
Negative gearing has to be viewed in the context of the broader tax system, especially personal income tax and capital gains tax.
WA deliver as HIA announces Top 100 Australian builders
HIA today announced its annual list of Top 100 Builders around the country with Western Australia well represented on the national stage. The Report ranks Australia’s largest 100 residential builders based on the number of homes commenced each year.
HIA reveals Australia’s largest home builders for 2024/25
Metricon celebrates a decade at number one
Government pushes ahead with Livable Housing provisions
Despite advocacy from HIA on behalf of our members, the Tasmanian Government has now confirmed it will proceed with implementing the next phase of Livable Housing Design requirements under the National Construction Code (NCC) from 1 October 2025.
NCIF Blueprint sets important roadmap for reform
The Housing Industry Association (HIA) has welcomed today’s commitment of the National Construction Industry Forum (NCIF) to a Blueprint for the Future at Parliament House in Canberra, to strengthen and prioritise Australia’s building and construction sector and accelerate housing delivery.
Negative gearing global comparison
| Country | Deductible expenses | Loss deductibility | Restrictions | Negative gearing coverage |
| Germany | Yes - everything | Other income |
|
Full negative gearing |
| Australia | Yes - everything | Other income |
|
Full negative gearing |
| Japan | Yes - everything | Other income |
|
Full negative gearing |
| Canada | Yes - everything | Other income |
|
Full negative gearing |
| Norway | Yes - everything except capital improvement | Other income |
|
Full negative gearing |
| France | Yes | Other income |
|
Partial negative gearing |
| United States | Yes | Other property |
|
Partial negative gearing |
| Ireland | Yes | Other property |
|
Partial negative gearing |
| Finland | Yes | Other capital gains |
|
Partial negative gearing |
| Spain | Yes | No |
|
No negative gearing but some deductibility of rental expenses |
| Sweden | No | No |
|
No negative gearing but some deductibility of rental expenses |
Further information:
For a more comprehensive look at international comparisons and property tax, please refer to these reports: