{{propApi.title}}
{{propApi.text}} {{region}} Change location{{propApi.title}}
{{propApi.successMessage}} {{region}} Change location {{propApi.title}}
{{propApi.text}} {{region}} Change location{{propApi.title}}
{{propApi.successMessage}} {{region}} Change locationReview urgently required to identify government constraints to productivity
Review urgently required to identify government constraints to productivity
Member and guest login
Enter your email and password to access secured content, members only resources and discount prices.
Did you become a member online? If not, you will need to activate your account to login.
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
Forgotten password
Need some help?
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
If the email address you have entered is registered, you will receive an email with further instructions.
Become part of the HIA community
Enables quick and easy registration for future events or learning and grants access to expert advice and valuable resources.
Create a guest account
Enter your details below and create a login
“Constraints on the industry reflect the large impost governments place on home building in Australia, not the efficiency with which the industry operates,” added Mr Reardon.
“The detached home building in Australia is one, if not, the most efficient in the world. A workforce that is largely engaged as subcontractors and are paid to complete a task, not by the hour, has developed an efficient industry.
“An inquiry into productivity in the sector is important to highlight the imposts that governments continue to add to home building, which cause delays, add costs and reduce labour productivity.
“Governments have recently introduced a range of measures through the National Construction Code that will add around $25,000 to the cost of a new home. These regulations add additional upfront costs, but they also place additional restrictions on house designs that further reduce the supply of homes. These measures were introduced despite their respective cost/benefit analysis recommending that alternate options be pursued.
“These changes will also see new home buyers paying a higher cost for carbon abatement than any other households in the economy, further reducing the supply of housing.
“These are just the latest additions to the cost imposts that reduce productivity and constrain housing supply.
“Perhaps the worst ‘own goal’ from governments is the imposition of taxes on foreign owned building companies. State governments impose punitive rates of stamp duty on foreign owned building companies that prevent them from developing new homes.
“If the goal is to continue to increase the level of pre-fabrication, the industry will require access to overseas finance, and the repeal of planning restrictions that prevent standardisation of materials and building systems.
“There are barriers in the design rules, approvals processes and financing arrangements, particularly for housing, that can make the use of prefabrication more difficult, if not impossible. These barriers are clearly impeding the productivity benefits that industry and governments understand and expect to flow from the prefabricated building sector. More information can be found here
“There are some common misconceptions regarding productivity in house building. This includes a misunderstanding of ABS 301 Res Bldg, which measures employment by building businesses. Direct employment by building businesses does not include those typically involved in onsite activities such as carpenters, joiners, electricians, etc. It measures direct employment of accountants, sales staff, lawyers, etc. Download here
“Direct employment in the industry has increased since the GFC, as the industry has become increasingly vertically integrated, and with the rise in pre-fabrication and to navigate increasingly complex systems. This has occurred with support from overseas investors and results in more labour off-site, and less labour onsite.
“Secondly, the rise in the number of trades persons, as measured by ABS 32 Construction Trades is not only a measure of trades in the building industry but across the economy. The rise in the number of trades people likely reflects, at least in part, the growth in trades in mining and public infrastructure sectors,” concluded Mr Reardon.
For more information please contact:
Home building materials prices still slower than CPI
“Home building materials have continued to experience only modest cost increases, up by 1.6 per cent in the 2024/25 financial year,” stated HIA Senior Economist, Maurice Tapang.
Productivity Commission backs HIA calls for major regulation overhaul
“Today’s interim report from the Productivity Commission overwhelmingly backs what HIA has long been saying - that the regulatory burden on businesses is getting worse in this country and there is need for a major overhaul on the approach to regulation,” said HIA Managing Director, Jocelyn Martin.
HIA welcomes key findings of interim Productivity Commission’s report
“The Housing Industry Association (HIA) welcomes the release of the Queensland Productivity Commission’s interim report into construction productivity It is a significant and necessary step toward overcoming the housing supply challenges facing Queensland,” said Michael Roberts, HIA Executive Director Queensland.
Building approvals pick up 2024/25
“New home building approvals in the 2024/25 financial year were up by 13.9 per cent compared to their 2023/24 trough,” stated HIA Senior Economist Tom Devitt.