Enter your email and password to access secured content, members only resources and discount prices.
Did you become a member online? If not, you will need to activate your account to login.
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
Enables quick and easy registration for future events or learning and grants access to expert advice and valuable resources.
Enter your details below and create a login
Australia will not meet its housing targets while continuing to tax the capital needed to build new homes, the Housing Industry Association (HIA) warns in its latest Stamp Duty Watch report released today.
“Foreign institutional capital does not create housing demand. It creates supply,” Mr Reardon said.
“Taxing this capital reduces the supply of homes being built, even as migration continues to surge and create demand. This is the worst own goal in the myriads of housing policy mistakes.
The report also finds that the average stamp duty bill on a median-priced home has now reached $31,210 nationally, a record high and a 55 per cent increase since 2019. In Queensland, the burden has nearly tripled. These upfront costs are forcing Australians to take on greater levels of debt, reduce the quality of housing they can afford, or delay entering the market altogether.
State governments have introduced punitive stamp duty and land tax surcharges on foreign capital over the last decade, with rates now as high as 9 per cent in New South Wales and 8 per cent in Victoria. Foreign institutional investors in those states now face up to $160,000 in stamp duty, land tax and foreign investment fees on a typical new dwelling, up to four-and-a-half times the amount paid by local investors.
“These imposts are likely to be revenue negative. Foreign capital is highly liquid and has moved to other economies that are open to foreign capital building apartments to meet the needs of a growing population.
The report stresses the need to distinguish between foreign investors, who fund new housing, and temporary residents, such as international students, who consume it. Misunderstanding this distinction has led to contradictory policies that stimulate housing demand while simultaneously penalising those who finance housing supply.
“The combination of surging migration and stagnant home building, constrained by poor policy design, has left Australia in a housing deficit,” Mr Reardon said.
“Reversing the foreign capital exodus is not only a rational economic choice, but also essential to delivering the homes Australians need.”
The Winter 2025 report calls for a reset of national housing policy, including:
“Stamp duty continues to block mobility and lock buyers out of the housing market,” Mr Reardon added.
“The proliferation of building standards in Council planning controls needs to stop now,” said Brad Armitage HIA Executive Director NSW.
“It is pleasing to see that should the Tasmanian Liberal Government be re-elected it is committed to planning reform and streamlining approvals that can deliver tangible and improved planning outcomes to get Tasmanians in homes faster,” said HIA Executive Director Tasmania Stuart Collins.
In line with this, HIA notes that the Sydney Water Price Proposal 2025-30 (SW proposal), highlights the critical relationship between the provision of water related infrastructure and housing delivery, and has set its capital expenditure proposal accordingly.
“Planning reform is a major part of solving the nation’s housing crisis and all state and territory governments need to implement major reforms now, to stem the tide of unaffordable housing.