Enter your email and password to access secured content, members only resources and discount prices.
Did you become a member online? If not, you will need to activate your account to login.
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
Enables quick and easy registration for future events or learning and grants access to expert advice and valuable resources.
Enter your details below and create a login
“At today’s Legislative Assembly Standing Committee on Planning, Transport and City Services hearing, HIA outlined the significant degree of ‘mission creep’ from the initial scope of the planned developer regulations.
“As an industry we accept the need for accountability in the development and construction sector, particularly for large and complex buildings. However, the ACT government needs to provide greater clarity of purpose in its proposed scheme.
"As it stands, the current Bill covers the field - everyone is 'a developer', and that’s not right.
“Builders of standalone houses and low-rise apartments are already required to be licenced in the ACT and there is also a functioning consumer protection system in place for these buildings, called home warranty insurance, which protects against defects and non-completion.
“This legislation would be labelling anyone in this part of the industry 'a developer' - and the compliance burden it brings.
"This would include builders of standalone houses which would serve no direct purpose or benefit adding yet another layer of regulation and one more impediment to solving our housing crisis.
“There is a balance to be struck between ensuring consumers are protected, having a shared responsibility across the supply chain, and businesses are not unduly hindered in addressing the critical housing shortage within the Territory.
“Alongside the developer licensing proposal, separate legislation also proposes to create a ‘reverse onus of proof’ for builders and developers when in litigation.
“Rather than requiring the person or group pursuing an action to establish that the builder or developer has caused the alleged problem, this effectively requires they prove their innocence. In many circumstances this could be impossible, with a builder having no control over what happens after handover.
"This is a fundamental shift from one of our basic principles of law, that you are innocent until proven guilty,” concluded Mr Weller.
It has become increasingly important for those participating in the building and construction industry to possess business skills.
This policy urges governments to fulfil their nation building obligations and spend more on key public urban infrastructure items to achieve both social and environmental savings for the whole community.
This policy sets out HIA's position relating to illegal corporate phoenixing and calls on government to define the practice and to have appropriate controls in place that do not unduly disadvantage businesses operating in good faith.
This policy sets out HIA's preferred approach to developing and implementing a planning systems that supports residential development and housing supply as an integral outcome. The policy identifies ten key elements of the planning system that should be addressed to achieve timely and cost effective housing supply.