Enter your email and password to access secured content, members only resources and discount prices.
Did you become a member online? If not, you will need to activate your account to login.
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
Enables quick and easy registration for future events or learning and grants access to expert advice and valuable resources.
Enter your details below and create a login
HIA members seeking to undertake commercial, multiunit or government funded work have cited concerns over many years regarding intimidation by the CFMEU and the influence they have on building sites regarding workplace conditions and who can work on particular jobs. The influence exerted over training, redundancy schemes, labour-hire and superannuation through enterprise bargaining agreements also impacts cost, productivity and restricts healthy competition.
Recognising the unproductive impact unions would have on the residential building industry, for years HIA has worked hard to ensure there is no direct union influence in the sector.
Off the back of the media coverage of these issues, it has been encouraging to see governments commit to a far-reaching independent review into the CFMEU.
Equally it is pleasing to hear that federal, state and territory governments are appalled by the situation and appear willing to take action.
At the same time, we fail to understand why any government representative would be shocked by these latest revelations and why it has taken this long to get action on these issues that have been identified in a number of past Royal Commissions, court cases and various government inquiries.
In response to these investigations and reports the Federal Government announced their intention to appoint an independent administrator to the CFMEU’s construction branches.
This follows a number of the CFMEU State Branches being placed into administration.
There must be zero tolerance for flouting the rule of law on or off construction sites and the appointment of an independent administrator to oversee the CFMEU’s operations is a good first step.
Furthermore, HIA calls on federal, state and territory governments to act in accordance with the seriousness and gravity of the situation and use the full extent of their legal powers to address these long standing issues.
The current business environment under which the CFMEU can conduct its activities lacks the accountability and transparency required of the rest of Australian businesses. It should surprise no one that the clandestine business environment afforded to the CFMEU is an enabler to corruption and poor business practices. The current situation, while difficult, is an opportunity for widespread and meaningful reform, accountability and transparency.
Many believe that weeding out corrupt individuals will fix the problem. It won’t. Structural change is required to prevent new corrupt officials replacing the old.
Government leadership is needed, and industry is relying on this to not be based on tokenistic measures or simply the announcement of another review or inquiry. Rather, measurable long term reform is needed to address this key issue once and for all.
How will we ever build affordable housing for Australia when the very people responsible are turning a blind eye to practices which fail to get value for tax payers?”
In mid-June 2025, the NSW Premier released the Housing and Productivity Contribution (HPC) Works-in-Kind Guideline for public consultation.
Today the State Government announced proposed changes to the regulatory powers to investigate registered builders who may be unable to meet the financial requirements of registration. The announcement also included a long-awaited review of the Home Building Contracts Act 1991 (HBCA) and associated laws.
Housing Industry Association welcomes today’s announcement by the Cook Labor Government to review key aspects of the home building contracts legislation and provide the building regulator with additional powers to work with builders in distress.
“Two cuts to the cash rate have seen the volume of detached house building approvals rise to be 3.2 per cent higher than the same month last year,” stated HIA Senior Economist Tom Devitt.