{{propApi.title}}
{{propApi.text}} {{region}} Change location{{propApi.title}}
{{propApi.successMessage}} {{region}} Change location {{propApi.title}}
{{propApi.text}} {{region}} Change location{{propApi.title}}
{{propApi.successMessage}} {{region}} Change locationCouncil housing targets need review to reflect housing Victorian's want
Council housing targets need review to reflect housing Victorian's want
Member and guest login
Enter your email and password to access secured content, members only resources and discount prices.
Did you become a member online? If not, you will need to activate your account to login.
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
Forgotten password
Need some help?
If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
If the email address you have entered is registered, you will receive an email with further instructions.
Become part of the HIA community
Enables quick and easy registration for future events or learning and grants access to expert advice and valuable resources.
Create a guest account
Enter your details below and create a login
Send me exclusive tips, early access to new launches, and special offers. I can change my mind at any time.
By clicking Get started now you agree to the terms and conditions and privacy policy.
“HIA acknowledges that specifying ambitious housing targets for each council to is important but recent reporting highlights that most councils are falling well short of their respective targets.
“This trend will only continue while the home building industry is further weighed down by increasing government taxes, costs and regulation reforms.
“The recent reports have identified two key issues with the housing targets.
“First, many suburban councils are not receiving sufficient numbers of applications for planning permits to meet their targets. Councils cannot be adversely judged if customers do not want to have homes built in the locations councils can make available.
“Second, almost all the councils that were exceeding their housing targets were those on the urban fringe of Melbourne.
“It is becoming increasingly clear that customer demand for greenfield land and homes is driving more building activity.
“HIA calls on the government to improve the collection and publication of planning and building approval data so that a process for capturing not only approvals, but number and type of applications, can be measured.
“This will provide a true basis for judging not only the performance of councils but provide key information about where Victorians want to have homes built and types of homes they want.
“While the Victorian government should be commended for setting ambitious housing targets, it also needs to collect and publish meaningful data so progress can be measured.
“Equally, as it continues to become apparent that planning permit applications are not being made in certain areas the government must be willing to review the housing targets to be more reflective of the types and locations of housing Victorian’s are seeking”, concluded Mr Ryan.
For more information please contact:
HIA calls for urgent reform of Tasmania’s Protection Work framework
The Housing Industry Association (HIA) is calling on the Tasmanian Government to urgently reform Tasmania's Protection Work framework, warning the current system is creating unnecessary delays, increasing costs and exposing builders and owners to uncertainty and risk.
Senate Select Committee on Productivity
Opening statement by Simon Croft, Chief Executive Industry & Policy
Housing supply set to fall as thousands of new home contracts face cancellation
"The ban on SMSFs building new homes undermines the governments’ objective of building 1.2 million homes and improving housing affordability,” said Tim Reardon, HIA’s Chief Economist.
More homes not more limits
HIA does not support amendment HOB-S11.0 to impose restrictions on visitor accommodation. We regard this amendment as a misguided attempt to achieve a worthwhile outcome by means that will be ineffective at best and counterproductive at worst.