If you are having problems logging in, please call HIA helpdesk on 1300 650 620 during business hours.
Enter details below and sign up
Part 2 of ‘Building Product Conformance and the NCC’ provides guidance to manufacturers and suppliers so they can:
For the purposes of these information sheets the term product refers to any material, system or component that is used in the construction of a building.
Part 1 of this series of information sheets sets out how to determine whether a product needs to conform with the NCC and how to determine the relevant performance requirements (Steps 1-3). Part 3 of this series explains how to prepare the relevant documentation to verify a product conforms (Steps 5-6).
This series is accompanied by a decision tree (Attachment A) to assist manufacturers and suppliers systematically work through the process of determining when and how a product can demonstrate conformance with the NCC.
The next step involves evaluating the product (through testing or collection of other evidence) to verify that it will perform as required and hence meet the relevant performance requirements of the NCC. As discussed in Step 3 (Part 1), there are three pathways available for this assessment – Deemed to Satisfy (DTS), Performance Solutions or a combination of the two.
Where it is appropriate to assess the product against the DTS provisions, then you will also need to determine whether your product aligns with an Acceptable Construction Practice (ACP) or an Acceptable Construction Manual (ACM). This is also outlined in Step 3.
It should be noted that contrary to popular myth, Volume 2 of the NCC only requires conformance to either an ACP or an ACM, or both. This is clearly identified in Volume 1 Part A2.3(3) and Volume 2 Part A2.3(3).
The information identified in these clauses should be linked to the Assessment Methods set out in the NCC to ascertain a product’s validity. Irrespective of the pathway to be utilised (ACP or ACM) the requirements to evaluate the product are set out in the NCC via:
This method involves the collection of evidence of suitability in accordance with Part A5 of the NCC, whether through product testing, comparison or other investigation that can show how a building product achieves the performance requirements or the DTS provisions.
A new window range is to be introduced into the market. In order to meet the performance requirement of P2.1(d) the DTS provisions of Part 3.6 will apply. This means that where applicable if the window is tested in accordance with AS 2047 and the glass is manufactured and installed in accordance with AS 1288, the window will meet the requirements of the NCC.
The manufacturer will need to develop supporting evidence to prove that the windows do comply with these Standards and hence the NCC.
This method relies on an expert in the field of construction providing their opinion about how the product is suitable for use and complies with the relevant aspects of the NCC.
A new timber engineered wood product is to be introduced into the market. Before it can be approved for use in a given situation it must be determined that it will be fit for purpose. This would include assessing it’s performance against the relevant sections of the NCC. In the majority of instances the product would be required to show proof of structural reliability. If the product were designed by an engineer to comply with AS/NZS 1170 Loading series and/or the AS 1720 Timber engineering standard it could be deemed appropriate for use in that situation.
There must again be supporting evidence provided with the expert’s judgement to accept that the product complies with the NCC.
If the product does not conform fully as a DTS Solution, it will be required to show compliance using a Performance Solution. If this is the case, it is likely that you will need to engage appropriate technical experts to assist you with the assessment of your product.
The process will involve the development of criteria that, if met, will demonstrate the product’s compliance with the required performance clauses of the NCC. Then the product must be evaluated against those criteria. Such criteria will vary depending on the product to be tested. Generally an expert in building certification, engineering or building products will be required to establish the relevant criteria and then to oversee or undertake the required assessment.
In conjunction with the assessment methods described under 4a above, the NCC sets out the Assessment Methods for demonstrating compliance of the Performance Solution under clauses:
These Assessment Methods are:
a)Evidence of suitability in accordance with Part A5 of the NCC, to show that it meets the performance requirements (in this case is a way other than the DTS provisions)
b)Use of a Verification Method
c)Use of Expert Judgement
d)Comparison with the DTS provisions
One of a combination of these Assessment Methods may be used to demonstrate compliance with the relevant Performance Requirement(s).
The NCC defines a verification method as being a test, inspection, calculation or other method that determines whether a building solution complies with the relevant performance requirements.
Within the NCC, most, but not all, verification methods apply to systems rather than a single product. Examples from Volume Two include:
The next step is to provide evidence that the building solution meets the requirements of the verification method and can be substantiated by modelling if required.
This method uses a comparison of the product with the information already contained in the relevant part of the NCC. Essentially this means using the DTS Provisions as a benchmark for comparison of the proposed solution will meet.
The following example shows how this assessment method can be used.
a)A new insulation material is to be introduced to the market for use as a thermal barrier in class 1 buildings (housing). In order to meet the performance requirement of P2.6 the DTS provisions of Part
3.12 will apply. Assuming the material has a range of R values it would have a number of uses under
220.127.116.11 for roofs; 18.104.22.168 for external walls and 22.214.171.124 for floors
d)It can be deduced from table 126.96.36.199 (a) that for walls in climate zone 7, a total minimum R value of R2.8 is required. From Figure 188.8.131.52 it can be deduced that the total R value of construction for a brick veneer wall is R 0.56. Therefore the required R value for the insulation product will be R 2.8 minus R 0.56 which equals R 2.24.
e)Assuming that one of the proposed products has been tested and has an R value of 2.5 then the first step of conformance is achieved.
The next step is to provide documentary evidence of how the product achieves the performance, in the above example the required R value. This aspect is addressed in Step 5.
Once you have completed the process in Step 4 you may find there are still gaps between the evidence you have and the evidence you need to verify the product meets the performance requirements. If so it is likely you will need expert assistance to help you develop the necessary information to fill the evidence gaps.
It is possible that a product cannot show how it meets the performance requirements, or essentially fails the tests. In this case, the manufacturer or supplier needs to determine if changes can be made to the product to achieve conformance. If changes are not possible, then the product should not be used for building construction which is required to comply with the NCC and potentially should not be used for other purposes, unless it can show that it is ‘fit for purpose’, being non-structural use or similar.
Part 3 of this series explains what type of documentary evidence needs to be provided once a building product has been evaluated against the Performance Requirements.
More articles on:
No matter the size of the job, a watertight building contract is critical to protect your business, and the current climate presents a great opportunity to go digital with your contracts.
Supporting building professionals with custom built services and products.